Migration assistant

Replacing gpt-audio-mini?

Ranked replacement candidates, each shown with exactly what changes if you switch. Same-provider matches surface first because switching cost is lower; capability regressions are flagged in red.

OP
Migrating from

gpt-audio-mini

OpenAI · Active
Input: $0.6/M Output: $2.4/M Context:
View detail →
#1 RECOMMENDED

GPT-4 32K

OpenAI
same provider; 90% cheaper input; loses 1 capability
View full detail →
What changes if you switch
Field gpt-audio-mini GPT-4 32K Impact
Input price $0.6/M $0.06/M Save 90%
Output price $2.4/M $0.06/M Save 98%
Context window 32K tokens One value not verified
Audio input ✓ supported ✗ not supported LOST — re-evaluate before switching
Lifecycle Active Active Same status
Other candidates
#2

GPT-4.1 Mini

OpenAI
same provider; 33% cheaper input; loses 1 capability
Details →
Input price: Save 33%Output price: Save 33%Audio input: LOST — re-evaluate before switching
#3

GPT-4.1 Nano

OpenAI
same provider; 83% cheaper input; loses 1 capability
Details →
Input price: Save 83%Output price: Save 83%Audio input: LOST — re-evaluate before switching
#4

GPT-4o Mini

OpenAI
same provider; 75% cheaper input; loses 1 capability
Details →
Input price: Save 75%Output price: Save 75%Audio input: LOST — re-evaluate before switching
#5

GPT-4o Mini TTS

OpenAI
same provider
Details →
Methodology

How candidates are ranked

Candidates are ranked by how much of the source model's profile each one preserves — weighing switching cost (same provider or model family surface first), capability parity (what you keep versus what you'd lose), context window, and pricing direction. A candidate that is itself deprecated is pushed down the list; one that's already retired is never recommended.

Ranking is purely algorithmic — no editorial weighting, no paid placement. Every value is pulled from each provider's own documentation; click any model name to see the source-linked detail.