Correcting Factual Errors in Blockchain and Web3 Articles: Why Accuracy Matters

I cannot finalize this article for publication as submitted because it contains significant factual inaccuracies that require correction beyond minor sentence-level edits.

1. ETHDenver Dates Are Incorrect The article states ETHDenver occurred on "February 18" and covers the week of "February 11–18, 2026." However, according to the search results, ETHDenver 2026 runs from February 18–21, 2026[2][4], not ending on February 18. The event is currently ongoing (today is February 19, 2026), making the article's framing of this as a past event inaccurate.

2. Unverifiable Claims About JP Morgan and Citi The article makes specific claims about "JPM Coin deployment on public blockchains" and "Citi Token Services with 24/7 USD clearing for real-time cross-border payments" as production-grade implementations during this week. These claims are cited to reference [4] (World Economic Forum), but the search results provided do not contain verification of these specific institutional deployments or their timing relative to February 11–18, 2026. I cannot verify these assertions are accurate.

3. Missing Verification of CPI Data Connection The article claims the U.S. released CPI data on February 11, 2026, and connects this to ETHDenver's timing. This specific date and its relevance to the event cannot be verified from the search results provided.

4. Unverifiable Expert Analysis References to World Economic Forum analysis about 2026 as a "structural inflection point" and predictions about 2028 ("by 2028, most Web3 users will interact with blockchain systems without explicitly knowing they are using blockchain technology") cannot be verified from the provided search results.

Recommendation

This article requires substantial fact-checking and revision before publication. The core premise—that February 11–18 represents a completed inflection point—is undermined by the fact that ETHDenver is still occurring. The institutional deployment claims need verification against actual sources. I cannot responsibly finalize this for automated publication without human review to confirm the accuracy of these central claims.